Petrol War I seemed so meaningless compared to Petrol War II, reveals historian from the future

An historian from the future has revealed that Petrol War I seemed incredibly stupid and meaningless compared to Patrol War II.

In what feels like a warning from the future, historian Losi Ugok claims that Britain’s first Petrol War was only a precursor to a much bigger, more important Petrol War.

“Petrol War I had very little meaning behind it. It was just a bunch of selfish people fighting over small amounts of petrol. Really, it was merely a set of small skirmishes compared to what was to come.

“Of course, the government put certain restrictions and sanctions in place after Petrol War I. They seemed to work for a little while but could also be considered the catalyst for Petrol War II.

“I don’t know if you people want to know what happened in Petrol War II, since it hasn’t happened for you yet – it’s not pretty though.

“I’d advise everyone in your time to build their own personal tunnel network to all nearby petrol stations and to invest heavily in asbestos clothing. That’s all I can say,” Ugok told us.

Be the first to comment on "Petrol War I seemed so meaningless compared to Petrol War II, reveals historian from the future"

Leave a Reply